Less than two hours after I posted Gathering Records to Tell the Story in late February my fourth cousin Ralph L. Hayes sent emails with images of the Chancery records for the 1864 divorce of John William CLONCH and Sarah Jane FOSTER – records which are not online.
Cousin Bait!
I was surprised and happy to finally see the records he had discovered years ago when he searched through old dusty unindexed boxes at the courthouse in Point Pleasant, West Virginia.
In Gathering Records to Tell the Story, I shared the entry in the court records concerning the divorce of my 2nd great-grandfather Alexander CLONCH from his first wife Mary Ellen LEMASTER. I’d only recently found this record and could not wait to share with my cousins who descend from the CLONCH line.
By sharing what I’d found I may have been subconsciously baiting cousins. Don’t we do this all the time? Sharing bits and pieces in hopes of a relative coming forward with new information. I wasn’t expecting Ralph to message me via Facebook so soon after I’d published the post. We hadn’t done email in 15 years but have been keeping up with each other via Facebook for 10 years.
It’s a complicated story
John W. CLONCH married Sarah Jane FOSTER on 20 February 1862 in Gallia County, Ohio. Many residents of Mason County crossed the Ohio River and state line to marry in Gallia. If Sarah Jane carried her first child to full term, she may have been with child when they married. Their son William Alexander was born on 2 October 1862. A year and a half later, about April 1864, a daughter was born to John and Sarah. By this time the marriage was already in trouble and divorce was the next step for Sarah.
I found a couple of entries in the Chancery orders and in a fee book concerning the divorce in 1864 when I located my ancestor Alex’s 1880 divorce records. My mentioning the 1864 documents in Ralph’s possession were not yet online pushed him to get in touch and email them to me.
In the meantime…
I’ve been a bit slow working on the documents as other things have kept me busy during the past few weeks.
I watched several of the 2019 RootsTech live sessions and got caught up in the DNA whirlwind caused by Ancestry and MyHeritage’s new tools. I’ve used up all 24 of the colors offered for grouping matches in the New & Improved DNA Matches (Beta). I’ve played with MyTreeTags on the small tree linked to the test I manage on Ancestry and found they are an excellent new tool for tree management. ThruLines™ is still aggravating me. They have a known problem with step-parents being considered as the ancestor. MyHeritage’s Theory of Family Relativity did not take long to look at as only 29 matches were offered. Several were spot-on. Several were not. Their AutoClustering was a bit disappointing as I was already spoiled by Jonathan Brecher and his Shared Clustering tool.
Ralph said, “Go for it!” In the days to come, I’ll share the transcriptions of the records he sent from the chancery case Sarah Jane Clonch vs John W. Clonch.
© 2019, copyright Cathy Meder-Dempsey. All rights reserved.
Cathy,
This is unrelated, but I’m wondering if you might know where to find the missing civil records during the French Revolution? I don’t know the specific years, but there is a gap in the village records on Familysearch. I know the marriage records for some of the years are at the commune level rather than the village. But what about birth and death records?
LikeLike
Shirley, are you talking about Luxembourg records? There are some years during the French Revolution where the birth, marriage, and death records are all in the same register. Which towns are you interested in?
LikeLike
I’ll have to look when I have a chance. I guess we’re FB friends so I can pm you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whenever you have time, Shirley.
LikeLike
As always Cathy, a pleasure to read and a place to learn! Brian
LikeLike
Thank you, Brian. 😎
LikeLike
I just love when blogging works out like that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The best thing about blogging, after “getting the stories told.” Thank you, Dara.
LikeLike
Awesome! Love this kind of news.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too! Thank you, Sharon.
LikeLike
It is always such a delight and a surprise when a cousin finds my blog and contacts me. As I’ve said before, I never, ever dreamed that would happen when I started the blog. (I just assumed people I already knew would read it.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Remarkable here was that we’ve been in connect for years and I never came straight out and asked for the records.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why were you shy about it? Glad he came forward!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve always been shy but blogging has helped me get over that a bit. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me, too. I’d still rather email someone than call them on the phone!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Congratulations on the fantastic find. You reeled in a whopper! (Wringing this cousin bait analogy for all it’s worth). Looking for to reading your analysis of the find.
LikeLike