Last Sunday I gave feedback to Ancestry on my ThruLines™. As I was writing the feedback message I realized it might be good material for a blog post. At the end of the feedback message, I let them know I might use it in a post.
Dear Ancestry, My Feedback on the Step Relationship Bug in ThruLines sat around in my drafts until Wednesday. I took a few moments to check my ThruLines™ as I’ve done every few days since they came out – getting more and more irritated.
Could it be Ancestry took my feedback into consideration and got the step-relationships fixed? Had they been ready to roll out a fix before or after I sent my feedback? Does it matter? Well, yes, I would like to know why it happened so quickly following the feedback I gave. I want to know if this step relationship bug in the ThruLines™ was solved for everyone or just for me.
I’m seeing Milla Susan PETERS as my great-great-grandmother. I’ve been hoping to see her ever since they gave me Nancy Elizabeth JOHNSON, the 2nd wife of Gordon Washington ROOP, as a potential 2nd-great-grandmother showing half-cousins as full cousins.
Why, you ask, was I so excited about one ancestor being corrected? One right ancestor means I should be seeing her parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents in my ThruLines™. All of these ancestors are from lines with many descendants who have had their DNA tested.
Although Milla Susan’s ThruLines shows only two DNA matches, the next generations have many more matches:
- 107 DNA matches through Jordan N. PETERS (father of Milla Susan)
- 33 DNA matches through Rachel PROFFITT (mother of Milla Susan)
- 68 DNA matches through Zachariah PETERS (father of Jordan)
- 129 DNA matches through Kesiah LIVELY (mother of Jordan)
- 113 DNA matches through David PROFFITT (father of Rachel)
- 110 DNA matches through Sarah COCKRAM (mother of Rachel)
- 123 DNA matches through Joseph LIVELY (father of Kesiah)
- 128 DNA matches through Mary L. CASH (mother of Kesiah)
- 97 DNA matches through Augustine “Austin” PROFFITT (father of David)
- 97 DNA matches through Elizabeth “Betsy” ROBERTSON (mother of David)
- 231 DNA matches through Edward COCKRAM (father of Sarah)
- 232 DNA matches through Mary WORTHAM (mother of Sarah)
It’ll take time to confirm each match is a descendant of the ancestor he/she is listed under as the lines down are only as reliable as the trees ThruLines™ uses to make the connection. The large number of matches for the PETERS, LIVELY, PROFFITT, and COCKRAM lines was expected due to the families being large and having many descendants.
But wait! Not only was the step-relationship corrected for Milla Susan PETERS, but I am now seeing <<drumroll>>
William is my most frustrating brick wall. Sarah Ann’s branch and all matches associated with it are very important. I hope they will help me to sort out all the matches for her side. This would leave only matches which will point to William’s unknown parents and ancestry. At least that is the way I believe it should work. ThruLines™ is showing potential parents for him which I cannot accept at this time.
Sarah Ann WOOD’s ancestry is bringing in many matches which will also have to be verified.
- 41 DNA matches through William A. W. DEMPSEY.
- 45 DNA matches through Sarah Ann WOOD (wife of William A. W.)
- 87 DNA matches through Elijah WOOD (father of Sarah Ann)
- 93 DNA matches through Rachel HONAKER (mother of Sarah Ann)
- 92 DNA matches through William WOOD (father of Elijah)
- 90 DNA matches through Mary Ann McGRAW (mother of Elijah)
- 162 DNA matches through Frederick HONAKER (father of Rachel)
- 154 DNA matches through Rachel WISEMAN (mother of Rachel)
- 70 DNA matches through Bailey WOOD (father of William)
- 95 DNA matches through Nancy _____ (mother of William)
- 147 DNA matches through Martin McGRAW (father of Mary Ann)
- 109 DNA matches through Margaret “Polly” _____ (mother of Mary Ann)
- 173 DNA matches through Hans Jacob HONEGGER (father of Frederick)
- 30 DNA matches through Maria GOETZ (mother of Frederick)
- 202 DNA matches through Isaac WISEMAN (father of Rachel)
- 204 DNA matches through Elizabeth DAVIS (mother of Rachel)
Another New Feature
ThruLines™ are now connected to the tree linked to a DNA test. On the pedigree view of the tree, there is now a DNA symbol in on the left to turn on this feature which adds a little blue ThruLines™ icon next to the ancestors’ names. William, Sarah, and Milla are ThruLines™ ancestors but in the pedigree view above they haven’t been updated. I discovered this about the same time my ThruLines™ were fixed on Wednesday.
Did the feedback I sent on Sunday to Ancestry on the ThruLines™ help them to get this fixed? I will likely never know. But I believe this was a lesson in giving the best feedback possible to help the team to get ThruLines™ working correctly. As I wrote in my feedback to them, ThruLines™ could be a powerful tool.
© 2019, copyright Cathy Meder-Dempsey. All rights reserved.